home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20030409-20031118
/
000226_chris@henschen.com_Sat Aug 16 13:00:19 EDT 2003.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2020-01-01
|
1KB
|
25 lines
Article: 14464 of comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!phl-feed.news.verio.net!nntp1.tagonline.com!nycmny1-snf1.gtei.net!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Chris Henschen" <chris@henschen.com>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Telnet vs Serial Connections
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:38:57 -0400
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <vjqa485l4taf82@corp.supernews.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 8
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:14464
I have had several inquiries to why a PC telnet connect appears to be slower
in screen draws, etc. then a serial connection at 38400. We use SCO Unix
and UnixWare servers with K95 for are emulator on windows. Can anyone offer
suggestions on this?
Chris